Sports

‘I’m against you’: Judge denies Rugby Australia extension in $30m case with Rebels

Former Melbourne Rebels board members have received an early minor win after a federal court judge rebuked Rugby Australia’s request for more time to respond to the ousted Super Rugby’s $30 million damages suit levelled against them.

The ousted Rebels, whose board members are on the hook for almost $8m, are demanding access to RA’s computer server. The members are seeking access to a RA computer server that hosted email accounts, calendars and Xero and MYOB accounting software.

The former Rebels board members are hoping to prove RA was aware of their financial situation and had promised to bail out the franchise, which collapsed in January with more than $20m in debts.

Loaded: 48.38%

Former Melbourne Rebels board members have received an early minor win after a federal court judge rebuked Rugby Australia’s request for more time to respond to the ousted Super Rugby’s $30 million damages suit levelled against them.

The ousted Rebels, whose board members are on the hook for almost $8m, are demanding access to RA’s computer server. The members are seeking access to a RA computer server that hosted email accounts, calendars and Xero and MYOB accounting software.

The former Rebels board members are hoping to prove RA was aware of their financial situation and had promised to bail out the franchise, which collapsed in January with more than $20m in debts.

Rebels players form a huddle after the Super Rugby Pacific Quarter Final match between Hurricanes and Melbourne Rebels at Sky Stadium, on June 08, 2024. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

RA remain steadfast that they did nothing wrong and no such promises were made.

As such, the governing body announced last month that they planned to countersue the seven former Rebels directors for deceiving the governing body about their financial position.

At the first day of hearings, Sydney silk Tony Bannon SC argued the Rebels’ statement of claim was deficient because it did not provide enough specific detail about the allegations it was making against the sporting body.

“They [the Rebels] plead that each of the directors relied on what we will describe as generalised, perhaps amorphous representations alleged to have been made by the respondent,” Bannon argued.

“We don’t know whether they were express. We don’t know whether they were implied.  We don’t know whether they were oral.  My learned friend says a number of these were oral. There’s no identification that these were express, applied or oral, and we’re entitled to at least know what they are.”

Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh and Chair Daniel Herbert speak to the media after announcing that the governing body would not bail out the Melbourne Rebels. (Photo by Morgan Hancock/Getty Images)

But Rebels counsel Philip Crutchfield KC told the court that RA was already familiar with the allegations and there had been “stony silence” from the sporting body regarding its claims for more than six months.

“Rugby Australia has been on notice made in the statement of claim since the 1st of March. On that day, we provided the solicitors for Rugby Australia with the draft statement of claim,” he said.

He added: “On 9 July, we provided another draft of the statement, and it’s … substantially in the same form as it is now.

“There has been no attempt by Rugby Australia to engage in the matter at all.”

The court heard the counsel for RA was only first briefed on October 22.

Justice Anderson, however, ruled that Bannon had demonstrated in court that he was well aware of the details of the case, and ordered that the national rugby body must file their counterclaim by November 7.

“Well, I’m afraid I’m against you, Mr Bannon,” he said.

“I think that you have sufficient – the pleading is such that it is pleaded with sufficient particularity to enable you to put on a defence. And I’m going to require you to do so. I’m not going to order that the applicant provide further and better particulars. You can take that up in correspondence with the respondent.”

The case is due back in the Federal Court on December 20.

 

Related Posts

เกิดอะไรขึ้น “ทีมชาติไทย” อดใช้ “2 ตัวหลัก” ประเดิม “อาเซียน คัพ” กับ “ติมอร์-เลสเต”

ทีมชาติไทย จะไม่สามารถใช้งานนักเตะตัวหลัก 2 ราย ในเกม อาเซียน คัพ นัดประเดิมสนามกับ ติมอร์-เลสเต วันที่ 26 พฤศจิกายน 2567 มาซาทาดะ อิชิอิ หัวหน้าผู้ฝึกสอนทีมชาติไทย ออกมาประกาศรายชื่อนักเตะ 26 รายที่จะลงทำการแข่งขันในฟุตบอลชิงแชมป์อาเซียน หรือ อาเซียน คัพ 2024 ระหว่างวันที่ 8 ธันวาคม 2567 ถึง…

By opening day, Shohei Ohtani intends to be hitting and pitching.

Hot on the heels of winning his third career MVP award, Los Angeles Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani is aiming to continue his torrid stretch of unbelievable performance. The hopes…

In two succinct words, Jason Kelce describes his performance against Travis Kelce’s Chiefs

At 10-1, the Kansas City Chiefs have the record of a juggernaut, even if they don’t have the look of a juggernaut. That was on display for all to see…

Christian Horner responde a las acusaciones de Toto Wolff sobre la investigación de la FIA

Christian Horner dice que le “sorprendió” ver los recientes comentarios de Toto Wolff sobre las breves acusaciones hechas el año pasado contra su esposa Susie Wolff. Susie y…

La llegada de Lewis Hamilton significa que Charles Leclerc tiene que hundirse o nadar

La decisión de Ferrari de fichar a Lewis Hamilton junto a Charles Leclerc pone de relieve al piloto que han formado. Como único junior de Ferrari que ha…

Lewis Hamilton envía un mensaje a sus fans mientras se acerca al “final de un capítulo, comienzo de otro”

Lewis Hamilton espera lucir los nombres de 150 afortunados fanáticos en su Mercedes W15 en su última carrera con el equipo. Hamilton y Mercedes han hecho historia juntos…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *